Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem or Ripley vs. Dutch?

Articles December 14th, 2007

Alien vs Predator RequiemWe’re sure the Angry Video Game Nerd will have something to say about the name of the newest installment of the Alien and Predator sagas. In good time, we’re certain AVGN will come up with a reason why they pluralized the title, as they did in the second film of the Alien series.

We have our own issues…

We’d like to discuss two problems with this addition to the series. First, the alternate reality that must be justified, wherein Aliens have made a public appearance on Earth, and thus, cannot be “discovered” in the 1979 film Alien. Second, the needless matching of Aliens and Predators, when the true contest is between a muscle-bound Austrian commando and a vengeful, female space pilot.

Time Continuum

Aliens land in Colorado, attack and spawn and are taken out (presumably) by one Predator. Super duper. But if that happens in the present day on Earth, shouldn’t the military already know about xenomorphs by the time Ripley’s space freighter cruises past LV-426? Perhaps we could justify all this, and tell ourselves that The Company knew just what was on the planet and were sending the crew of the Nostromo down to pick up a live sample.

Still, you’d think an outbreak in the U.S. would get plenty of news coverage, and there would be an historical record of the events and the creature. We suppose we’ll actually need to watch AVP: R to find out the answer to that question.

Of course, we realize that we’re supposed to dismiss all of this. Just as we might dismiss the concept of Superman & Batman vs. Alien & Predator, because, boy, wrapping your head around that whole mess, with a view for reality, could give you an aneurysm.

The real problem with the Alien vs. Predator series—a problem that has been inherent since Dark Horse published the first comic book—is that the film fails to recognize the two true adversaries whose skills should be tested in mortal combat.

Ripley vs. Dutch

Yes, why not a film where Major Alan “Dutch” Schaefer and Lieutenant Ellen L. Ripley battle to the death? It makes perfect sense. Ripley battles Alien and wins. Dutch battles Predator and wins. The next matchup should be Ripley vs. Dutch.

Even Lieutenant Mike Harrigan (Danny Glover’s character in Predator 2) would be a decent contender. Of course, we wouldn’t send him into the ring with Ripley. There’d be no surprises there. But maybe he could fight the torso of Bishop or something. We wouldn’t watch that, but still, these are victors! Victors move on to the next round, not losers.

Whatcha think?

Would you see Ripley vs. Dutch over AVP: Requiem?

Tags:

Hefty Inaccuracies in Die Hard: With a Vengeance

Reviews December 2nd, 2007

“Damn, this is heavy.” - Samuel L. Jackson as Zeus Carver

He said it well. Gold is a dense element. Its immense value per gram makes it the perfect stuff to jam into a vault. In a few rooms, you can store the revenue of a nation. Try doing that with pictures of Ben Franklin; you’ll find you need a warehouse.

Much to the joy of Hollywood, there really are vaults gleaming with bricks of the stuff. But, could you really rob one the way that it’s done in Die Hard 3?

No.

The value of the gold in the film is $140 billion. This is how much Simon claims to be stealing, though a few bars got left behind at the vault excavation. We can assume that Simon’s men were able to load almost all of the gold into their 14 dump trucks, because Simon says the dump truck John McClane hijacks contains $13 billion worth of gold.

Actually, dividing $140 billion over 14 trucks, an estimate of $10 billion per truck would be sensible. So either Simon knows that one has a little extra (it was the last one after all) or he’s just inflating the number to try and get McClane to take the bribe.

By weight, even $10 billion in gold couldn’t fit in one truck.

The dump truck McClane steals is a Mack R685ST. The 6 in that name refers to the chassis rating, indicating it’s built to support 6,000 pounds of weight. The movie was released in 1995, and during that year, gold was valued at around $385 USD per troy ounce, or approximately $5,616 per pound.

That means that by weight, the truck in the film could hold about $33.7 million in 1995 gold. And $10 billion would require almost 300 dump trucks (like the one in the film) to transport.

The total $140 billion in 1995 gold would load nearly 4,150 trucks as used in the film… a far cry from the 14 used in shooting.

scales.jpg

By volume?

Of course, maybe the director (John McTiernan, who also helmed the technically inept Hunt for Red October) was thinking of volume. You know, if somehow you were able to fill a dump truck to the brim with gold bars, and weight was not the limiting issue.

I can’t be certain of all the dump trucks used in the film, but for this example, let’s assume the cargo area of the trucks was a generous 16’ long, 8’ wide and 5’ tall. Let’s also assume that all the gold bricks were perfectly stacked, and came in 1 kilo bars of 80 mm long, 40 mm wide and 18 mm thick.

This gets you close. I calculate that if this entire space was filled with 1995 gold, it would be valued at $8.76 billion.

You could, but boy would it be heavy.

At that rate, a few extra dollars an ounce would get you to the $140 billion mark. Perhaps Simon was expecting a mild price jump given the tremendous heist and supposed detonation of the gold.

Of course, using volume measurements is downright crazy. Since the film didn’t take place in outer space, we can’t push our disbelief so far as to ignore the force of gravity entirely.

Suspension (of disbelief)

It’s the movies, so it seems like we should hold out tongues and feign acceptance. $140 billion in 14 dump trucks? Sure why not. That’s what we told ourselves before we started doing the math. With a disparity this great, it’s interesting to see the numbers.

Possibly remedy

The film makers could have doubled the number of trucks, and gotten away with saying they contained $1 billion. Of course, that wouldn’t be enough money to wreck the national economy. Then again, with the way we throw money at the middle east, perhaps $140 billion wouldn’t cripple us either.

The alternative—filming 4,150 loaded dump trucks escape from Manhattan on a weekday afternoon—would raise even more eyebrows among the city’s millions of commuters.

Next time, I hope he turgs the sucker. Today, John McTiernan has recognized the mistakes concerning the weight of gold. Of course, being 300 times off the mark, is bad even by Bruckheimer standards.

For more on Hollywood’s magical power over weight and volume, read Cockeyed.com’s “How Much is Inside a Million Dollars.”

Get all 4 Die Hard films on Blu-Ray DVD… We Did!

Tags: ,

Close
E-mail It